The Great Wall might well symbolise the accounting veracity barriers in China Image: www.crystalinks.com |
1: For any firms (including those outside of China) where the financial statements cannot be depended upon to be reliable, the only thing for an investor to do is to avoid it like the plague, regardless of how profitable the trade might seem. The reason might be obvious, but let me say it loud and clear: If the financial statements are not reliable, there is no means of knowing what is going on in the business, unless you are an insider.
2: Reputation is actually worth something. This doesn't mean that one should only invest in well-known firms, indeed great opportunity might lie in small unknown firms. But then there might be a need for a larger discount factor to take into account any unknown risks. Or to put it another way, the expected profits from such less known investments should be fairly large, to compensate for the higher "risks".
3: Another point to note from the Reuters' article is, for those Chinese firms that are formed out of reverse mergers, they did not undergo the rigours of the American IPO process, which thus give rise to such abuses.
4: There are other ways to play China than to invest directly in the country's companies. International firms doing business in China, or selling their products in China (or for that matter the other countries in rapidly growing countries), can be a safer way to get the China exposure, without the Chinese accounting issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment